Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Does having troops in Afghanistan make us more secure?

(I apologize to Row in advance--or anyone else that is of a similar mindset, and advise them to read no further. actually, no one should read further. I am incredibly cynical and opinionated)

I don't think having troops in Afghanistan makes us more secure. If anything, I think it makes us less secure. Not that I think that, as an average American citizen, I need to worry about my security.

First of all, I don't think that having troops in Afghanistan makes us more secure because I don't think the U.S. has accomplished anything in Afghanistan (ok, maybe a little bit, but not enough for anyone to feel comfortable enough to hop on a plane and take a family vacation in Kabul). The United States is trying to build a strong democratic government in Afghanistan, but we really haven't made any progress. Instead of having "nice" democratic government OF AFGHANISTAN where the citizens aren't oppressed by the Taliban, the Afghanis have a "nice" democratic government OF THE UNITED STATES prodding the citizens with their guns. If I was them, I would hate the U.S. The U.S. hasn't accomplished its mission to make the Middle East more stable. Sure, if the democratic government in Afghanistan was to succeed, then further U.S. stabilization of the Middle East (countering terrorism, spreading nuclear non-proliferation) would run smoother.

Second, I think having troops in Afghanistan makes us (slightly) less secure because the U.S. is pushing democracy, where maybe democracy just won’t work out. Islam and democracy haven’t seen a good balance yet, even in Saudi Arabia. When democracy moves in, the hegemony of U.S. culture moves in and overpowers Islam. When Islam is around, the leaders fight the U.S. culture hegemony proactively and build up hate (spawning terrorism). Osama bin Laden snowballed his hate for the U.S. into terrorism because of the changes he saw in Saudi Arabia. IN NO WAY AM I JUSTIFYING TERRORISM, but the underlying motives were rational: the U.S.’s culture was a threat to the existence of Islam, and terrorism is a defense mechanism to prevent the youth from turning to the dark side. The U.S. is potentially fueling this fire by meddling where people don’t want us. Some do, but some crazy radicals called terrorists do not. Historically, we know that Afghanis don’t like people messing in their backyard. And they’re very good at keeping them out. How easy of an argument would it be for the terrorists to say, “hey, that U.S. is meddling with us, We can’t let them! Protect our sovereignty. They want to destroy our religion.”

Thirdly, I don’t think that, as an average citizen, we need to worry about security because I think that living with fear is the worst way to live. Other people (aka the military, DoD, State Department, CIA, and every other government agency) are working to keep me safe so that I don’t HAVE TO worry, and they’re doing a great job of it. I’m not taking them for granted, but nor do I think I need to worry about terrorism every time I step on a plane or question the possibility of asbestos in the dorm room vents (oooh now have I gotten you paranoid??). If you wanted to, you could notice that that person on the metro has a suitcase that would be perfect to put a bomb in. Do I want to live in fear? No.

At the rally this weekend this really really really really creepy guy pushed through the crowd near me with a grocery bag and a suitcase. He proceeded to put his belongings down and turn, facing the opposite direction of everyone else. He stood silently and unmoving for about 5 minutes. His eyes were glossy and he looked like he’d been living in a crypt. After awhile a person behind me said, “Hey, we should ask that creep what’s in his bag.”

All I could think was that that was a very stupid comment. For one second, the possibility that it was a bomb or other weapon went through my mind, but I decided I didn’t care enough to let it bother me. Other people in the crowd, however, shuffled him away and I later saw him escorted by a security guard. In eluding to terrorism, the commenter behind me had helped the terrorists by spreading fear.
It’s just like what our teachers taught us in elementary school: the bullies can’t bother you if you don’t let them.
Stop worrying about terrorism, and the terrorists won’t have anything left to feed on.

2 comments:

  1. "Do I want to live in fear? No." Why not? As Holly points out in her post (http://andorranatmosphere.blogspot.com/2010/11/do-i-feel-secure.html), fear plays a functional role in our lives when it is justified. How do we know if we should be afraid or not?

    Also, I would love to see a blog debate between you and Rowland! You both make some really good points, though your two posts talk past each other to some extent.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would definitely agree with you that there is no reason to live in fear because there are those that as George Orwell said, "stand ready in the night to visit violence upon on those who would do us harm." These being the agencies that you mentioned before. Fear is a dangerous thing and I would agree that it causes us to overreact causing unncessary consequences on the economy etc...
    However, as you might expect, I take issue with some of your statements. Especially the last one. The thing about bullies is there are those that even if you leave them alone they'll just escalate things to get a response from you. This is what I described as happening in the period from 1991 to 2001 in my blog post. We ignored the threats, tried to "turn the other cheek" as it were and things escalated. Somalia, Khobar towers, embassy bombings, USS Cole, and finally 9/11.
    I certaintly believe that when you do use force it must be used in an intelligent fashion. What I mean by this is that it is not simply a campaign of shock and awe and that there has to be an infrastructure building element. And I actually think you're right about imposing democracy on others. Despite what I probably tend to put out in class, I think that if the people want a different society such as regional governments instead of a strong central one, than they should be able to. The issue is that whatever the government, freedom must be allowed because otherwise it will fall into the same pattern of totalitarianism rule. This is why we will need to have a constant presence in Afghanistan much like what is occuring in Iraq. It will take years, but to deny the terrorists thier biggest stronghold will go a long way for security as they will have limited options for which to operate from. Before any of this happens corruption must be stamped out however.
    None of these things will occur obviously if we leave. Again I must say that from personal experience that many bullies will not leave you alone unless you lay them out on thier back. Is it worth taking a chance that terrorists will decide to leave us alone. We took that chance before and nearly 3,000 people are dead as a result.

    ReplyDelete