Thursday, August 26, 2010

Biggest Problem in World Politcs? You’re Living in It.

Hey, America: It’s time to start taking responsibility for your exponentially growing list of international fouls.


The G-20 would unanimously agree that this is certainly not the best of times, and it seems as though international law has been replaced by Murphy’s Law. Yet as the financial system teeters on the precipice of oblivion, we must overcome the shock of sudden instability in order to properly examine what actually happened. I’m not talking about a quick point of the finger at George Bush or Alan Greenspan – I’m proposing a complete review of the “American Dream” as it has been interpreted over the last century. When did this dream stop translating to a single family home with a white picket fence to call your own and morph into a dangerous black hole of greed, violence, and unchecked capitalism? When did Adam Smith’s invisible hand suddenly start wearing brass knuckles?

There is certainly enough blame to be passed around to all sectors of the business cycle. However, in searching for the cause of this great breakdown, deregulation seems to be the primary culprit. While this crisis has been highly politicized, both Democrats and Republicans carry blemished regulatory records. Jimmy Carter began the process of deregulation before the efforts of Ronald Reagan, and soon policymakers advocated self-regulation. Yet in a world driven by greed, self-regulation equates to no regulation. Our intelligent government ended the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, allowing commercial banks to combine with investment banks and insurance companies. We put our faith in internal risk management and market discipline, yet neither exists when the risk takers are making extraordinary profits in the banking industry. But before we let our emotions over foreclosures and negative bank balances lead us to a public lynching of Lloyd Blankfein and poor Jamie Dimon, let’s understand that it was our own government that allowed this meltdown to occur. Don’t let the media or the cunning politicians trick you into believing that Wall Street investment bankers are the only enemy. The world economy is not in shambles because of a few bathroom renovations at Goldman Sachs. We watch as Obama slaps the bankers on the wrist and makes them promise to never do it again, then the cameras are shut off as JP Morgan deposits a fat check in the back pocket of the next campaigning politician.

So as Karl Marx rolls in his grave, the fearless leaders of the United States of America continue to screw up. But here comes the kicker – the one truth that escalates our presence as a greedy and capitalist nation to number one on the list of problems in world politics: the effects of our failed system stretch beyond our shining seas. Our bundles of toxic assets crossed the Atlantic to cripple entire Norwegian cities, while simultaneously tearing down the infallible Euro. Whether we deserve the title or not, the US is a definite “big player” on the world stage. When our economy came to a screeching halt in 2008, so did the sale of generic TVs and microwaves (oops…sorry Hu Jintao), and our misfortune meant international misfortune in the age of globalization. In addition to the short-term negative effects of our banking blunders, America’s threat to international stability will continue to grow so long as the greed machine on Capitol Hill controls foreign policy. I recall a promise made by Barack Obama involving the withdrawal of troops from the Middle East. Does sending tens of thousands of more troops into Afghanistan fulfill that promise? While it may not satisfy the wishes of the crazy, fringe liberals who had the audacity to hope that in fact this Barack guy may not be just another corrupt politician, it certainly appeased General Electric, one of the nation’s top defense contractors AND generous supplier of campaign funds. Stirring up unnecessary wars in already fragile areas of the world is not good for international politics, but it is great for American capitalism. Our politicians are so easily swayed by greed that waving a couple of Benjamins in their faces every so often is enough to push the agendas of lobbies and special interest groups through congress, thus overlooking human rights violations in Palestine and crucial treaties to lessen the effects of global warming. The influence of the US is undeniable, as is the unending list of international catastrophes. Yet until we swallow the antidote to cure this infectious wave of unchecked greed and unregulated capitalism that plagues the nation, our undesirable symptoms will continue to contaminate the world’s economy and political system. Wake up America: for the sake of the globe, ignore the bread and circuses and force the pill down Uncle Sam’s throat.

2 comments:

  1. I'm intrigued by your view that the United States is defined by unregulated capitalism. Certainly, the host of regulatory agencies (FDA, ICC, FTC, FDIC, FRB) in the US federal government suggests otherwise.

    Your argument here seems to be greed is the primary motivators of both private interests and public policymakers. Do you think greed is inherent in human nature or is it specific to U.S. economic and political culture? Are the people working for PEPFAR, for example, motivated by greed? What about policymakers at the state and local level? AU's student government?

    For a question about world politics, your response is quite America-centric. Why? Does our superpower status inherently make us the most important issue in world politics, no matter what we do? Would you have the same critique of American economics and politics if our economy was the size of Panama's or if we had the geopolitical clout of Burundi?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Erin,

    I'd like to grapple your questions chunk by chunk, so I'll start with the first part:

    "I'm intrigued by your view that the United States is defined by unregulated capitalism. Certainly, the host of regulatory agencies (FDA, ICC, FTC, FDIC, FRB) in the US federal government suggests otherwise."

    Erin, I would first like to say that I don't at all believe that the United States is DEFINED by our unregulated capitalism. I would hope a nation is not defined by its most negative issue. I simply was trying to point out that the largest problem in world politics was the ECONOMY of the United States. But if we were on the subject of regulatory agencies, I would like to point out that they are not as benevolent as they seem. The FDA, for example, has been under investigation many times for rushing out a new drug (because of drug company "influence") which damages the public leading to a mass recall.

    "Your argument here seems to be greed is the primary motivators of both private interests and public policymakers. Do you think greed is inherent in human nature or is it specific to U.S. economic and political culture?

    For private interests, I think it is very fair to say greed is a primary motivator. What is the point of having a business if not for maximum profit? Many would agree that the Wall Street heavy-hitters are hardly in it for the good of the public. As for public policymakers, it is pretty fair to link the most well-funded lobbies with the most political influence. AIPAC is a prime example of this. As for the other questions, they are a bit more philosophical in nature, and I'm afraid it is an age-old question that Hobbes and Locke are still rolling in their graves over. Personally, I believe every man is motivated by greed and self-interest, but that is hardly provable.

    "For a question about world politics, your response is quite America-centric. Why? Does our superpower status inherently make us the most important issue in world politics, no matter what we do? Would you have the same critique of American economics and politics if our economy was the size of Panama's or if we had the geopolitical clout of Burundi?"

    The reason I made my response America-centric is because the _world_ is America-centric. We are considered the "policemen" of the globe, we are the number one superpower, and we actively work to spread our democratic beliefs to the rest of the world. No matter what nation is the global superpower, they will immediately have the spotlight. I think I can easily say that I would not deem the American economy or political structure as significant of an issue if it were the size of Panama or Burundi because, quite frankly, no one really cares about Panama or Burundi. US decisions affect the entire globe, whether we (or they) like or not. For a country like Panama, their influence isn't even comparable.

    ReplyDelete